I've got a very small dataset that I am attempting to use for a client demo, and seem to be having an issue using the lat/long to create a geographic hierarchy.
I'm trying to test with a small subset that looks like this:
| Zip Code | City | County | Latitude | Longitude |
| 53717 | Madison | Dane | 43.041271 | -89.805964 |
| 53719 | Madison | Dane | 43.029235 | -89.503360 |
| 53715 | Madison | Dane | 43.062887 | -89.398818 |
| 53704 | Madison | Dane | 43.122640 | -89.349188 |
| 53705 | Madison | Dane | 43.073444 | -89.459769 |
| 53713 | Madison | Dane | 43.035989 | -89.393531 |
| 53916 | Beaver Dam | Dodge | 43.460949 | -88.837933 |
| 53598 | Windsor | Dane | 43.211288 | -89.341756 |
| 53718 | Madison | Dane | 43.097340 | -89.278388 |
I am able to acquire the data, and from there I click on City to create a geographic hierarchy by lat/long:
But it doesn't appear to be working correctly, as it only assigns values to one record (I've tried it with both six values after the decimal point and only two values, and the fields are defined as numeric).
Can anyone figure out what I am doing wrong? Am I trying to be way too granular? The towns in question (outside of Madison) are fairly small so using the name recognition won't work for them..
Thanks in advance,
Jeff